Trigger-based adaptive proton therapy improves coverage and cardiac sparing in esophageal cancer
Adaptive IMPT improved cumulative target coverage and reduced heart dose without increasing lung dose in a 192-patient retrospective cohort.
Adaptive IMPT improved cumulative target coverage and reduced heart dose without increasing lung dose in a 192-patient retrospective cohort.
PET/CT reduced mean PTV by 149 cm³ while identifying substantial disease outside CT-based targets in 20% of patients.
ITV underdosage occurred in 21% of distal esophageal IMPT patients, yet no GTV underdosage occurred and tumor response was unchanged.
Heart-base-optimized IMRT/VMAT reduced cardiac avoidance area mean dose by about 6 Gy without compromising target coverage.
Concurrent and consolidation ICI produced similar pathological response rates once analyses were restricted to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy studies.
Each 10-Gy increase in biologically effective dose was associated with 39% higher odds of pathological complete response in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Maximum cardiac avoidance area dose below 43.5 Gy was associated with longer median survival after curative-intent oesophageal radiotherapy.
NRF2 directly activated WNT5A, sustaining β-catenin signaling, cancer stemness and radioresistance across esophageal cancer models.
Patients aged ≥75 years with CIRS-G ≥7 had median overall survival of 16 months after definitive chemoradiotherapy.
A broad 6R-based review identifies numerous radiosensitization targets, but most remain preclinical and evidence is heavily concentrated in squamous-cell carcinoma.
Tumor location, hypertension and albumin predicted moderate-to-severe acute esophagitis with an internally validated AUC of 0.816.
Mean heart dose increased during esophageal IMPT, while heart-dose–triggered replanning reduced the excess dose in patients requiring adaptation.
Chemoradiotherapy suppressed LAMC2–macrophage signalling, while immunoradiotherapy enriched CCL5-positive CD8 T cells in preclinical esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma models.
Three-year outcomes numerically favored 50.4 Gy over 60 Gy, while multivariable analysis found no significant survival advantage from either dose.
A randomized phase II trial will test whether intravenous tetrandrine reduces grade 2 or higher lung injury from 25% to 10%.