KEY POINTS
- This retrospective single-institution cohort included 113 consecutive patients receiving curative-intent external-beam breast or chest-wall re-irradiation after surgical resection of an ipsilateral recurrence between 2010 and 2024. Median follow-up was 67.1 months.
- Median interval between radiation courses was 12.3 years, median re-irradiation dose was 45 Gy, and median cumulative EQD2 was 94.9 Gy. Treatment used 3D conformal radiotherapy in 74.3% and IMRT in 25.7%.
- Long-term disease control was favorable. Five-year locoregional recurrence-free survival was 84.2% (95% CI 76.7-92.4), overall survival was 82.1%, and cumulative local failure was only 6.8%.
- Severe late toxicity remained uncommon despite repeat irradiation. Five-year cumulative grade ≥2 toxicity was 35.4%, but grade 3 toxicity was only 3.9%, with no grade 4 or 5 events.
- Cumulative radiation dose was the strongest independent toxicity predictor. Each additional 10 Gy EQD2 nearly doubled grade ≥2 toxicity risk (sHR 1.94, p<0.001) and was associated with a more than fourfold increase in grade 3 toxicity risk (sHR 4.32, p<0.001).
- Technique mattered substantially. Five-year grade ≥2 toxicity was 15.0% with IMRT versus 43.4% with 3DCRT, and IMRT remained independently protective on multivariable analysis (sHR 0.40, p=0.005). A longer interval between radiation courses was also associated with lower toxicity.
- Among early-stage recurrences, partial breast or chest-wall re-irradiation did not compromise locoregional control compared with whole-volume re-irradiation. Conversely, locally advanced disease and second or subsequent recurrence were independently associated with worse recurrence-free survival.
CLINICAL TAKEAWAY
Curative-intent photon re-irradiation can provide durable control in carefully selected patients with resected ipsilateral breast or chest-wall recurrence, with relatively low severe toxicity. Cumulative dose, treatment interval and technique appear more informative than simply asking whether a second course of radiation is possible, although prospective validation of the proposed dose-risk relationships is needed.