Unilateral RT produced no contralateral neck failures in N2b oropharyngeal cancer

No contralateral neck recurrences occurred among 43 N2b patients receiving unilateral RT despite frequent high ipsilateral nodal burden.

KEY POINTS

  • This two-centre retrospective series included 58 patients with well-lateralised oropharyngeal SCC treated definitively with unilateral neck RT between 2015 and 2021. 94.8% were p16 positive, and 96.5% had tonsillar primaries.
  • Nodal disease was substantial: 43/58 patients (74.1%) had TNM7 N2b disease. Among evaluable N2b patients, 50% had a node ≥3 cm, 43% had ≥3 involved nodes and 40% had disease outside levels II/III.
  • Most patients received 65 Gy in 30 fractions, and 79% received concurrent systemic therapy. Median follow-up was 72 months.
  • Contralateral neck-only recurrence occurred in only 2/58 patients (3.4%). Both events occurred in N1 disease, and neither patient completed the planned systemic therapy.
  • Most importantly, 0/43 N2b patients developed contralateral neck-only recurrence, including patients meeting one or more predefined high nodal-burden criteria.
  • Both patients with isolated contralateral recurrence underwent salvage neck dissection and remained disease-free for more than five years after salvage.
  • Overall, 13 patients recurred: 9 locoregionally and 4 distantly. Among N2b patients, the dominant failures remained primary-site or ipsilateral-neck rather than contralateral-neck relapse.
  • The subgroup meeting all three high-burden criteria had a numerically higher locoregional recurrence rate of 33% (2/6), but event numbers were far too small to define a new risk group.

CLINICAL TAKEAWAY

For a truly well-lateralised, predominantly HPV-associated tonsillar cancer with a clinically negative opposite neck, ipsilateral nodal burden alone may not mandate bilateral irradiation. The cohort is small and retrospective and contains almost no HPV-negative or non-tonsillar disease, so rigorous laterality assessment remains essential before applying this approach more broadly.

SOURCE

Clinical Oncology

Browse more research Suggest a correction