36.25 Gy/5 showed similar five-year control to 40 Gy/5 in prostate SBRT

After propensity matching, five-year PSA recurrence-free survival was 94.5% with 36.25 Gy versus 93.2% with 40 Gy.

KEY POINTS

  • Investigators retrospectively reviewed 863 consecutive patients receiving curative prostate SBRT between 2016 and 2025. Propensity matching for age, PSA, Gleason score, T stage, NCCN risk and ADT produced 530 matched patients.
  • Treatment consisted of either 36.25 Gy or 40 Gy in five fractions, delivered every other day using VMAT and daily CBCT. The prespecified non-inferiority boundary was an HR of 1.40.
  • Five-year event-free survival was 90.0% with 36.25 Gy versus 88.1% with 40 Gy (p=0.37). The HR for 36.25 versus 40 Gy was 0.76 (95% CI 0.42–1.39), with the upper confidence bound just below the prespecified non-inferiority margin.
  • Five-year PSA recurrence-free survival was similarly high: 94.5% versus 93.2% (p=0.76). Importantly, 15% of PSA recurrences occurred after five years, supporting the need for longer observation when comparing prostate SBRT dose schedules.
  • No grade ≥3 acute toxicity occurred. Across the full safety population, severe late GI/GU events were uncommon; no grade 4 toxicity occurred after 36.25 Gy, while several grade 4 GI/GU events occurred in the 40-Gy cohort. No grade 5 toxicity was reported.
  • EPIC urinary irritative/obstructive scores recovered toward baseline after the initial post-treatment decline and were significantly better with 36.25 Gy at 3, 12 and 24 months. Bowel and sexual-domain scores did not differ significantly.
  • The main confounding issue is substantial: 36.25 Gy was predominantly used before mid-2018, whereas 40 Gy was introduced later, and rectal-spacer use after matching remained 20.8% versus 74.0%. The apparent non-inferiority and QOL differences therefore remain hypothesis-generating rather than equivalent to a randomized dose comparison.

CLINICAL TAKEAWAY

These data provide further reassurance that 36.25 Gy in five fractions remains a highly effective prostate SBRT regimen, with no obvious disease-control advantage for 40 Gy in this cohort. They do not establish that dose escalation is unnecessary, because the comparison is strongly confounded by treatment era and spacer use.

SOURCE

Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology

Browse more research Suggest a correction